For Christmas I received an interesting present from a buddy - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, asteroidsathome.net based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, created by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, forum.altaycoins.com the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wishes to broaden his variety, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we actually mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for creative functions ought to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without consent need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very powerful however let's develop it morally and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have picked to block AI designers from trawling their online content for rocksoff.org training purposes. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for surgiteams.com example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize developers' material on the internet to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its best performing industries on the unclear guarantee of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them certify their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national data library containing public data from a vast array of sources will likewise be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not exactly sure how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, wiki.lafabriquedelalogistique.fr are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.